Thursday, 2 February 2017

Evaluation of rough cut:

Overall, I belive that the title sequence was a success, because as a group we made sure that we filmed enough footage, even if it wasnt needed in the end. We didnt waste any time in the filming days, therefor we got to edit as soon as we finished filming, which gave us extra time perfect our rough cut.
Our footage is of high quality because we made sure that the lense was focussed as well as using fig rigs and tripods to make sure the camera was held steady and wasnt slanted in any way. We also made sure that the lighting was of good quality aswell. Not olny did we rely on natural lighting, but we also used the dedo lights to create sharp lighting, to enhance the atmosphere in the shot. We tried to be as creative as we could, by trying out different types of angles, which fit with our narrative and mise-en-scene.
As I was one of the people acting in the title sequence i cant help but say that me and Jayah performed really well, and tried to make it as realistic as we possibly could. The fact that i studied drama previously as a GCSE also helped me in my performance in front of the camera.
We chose to use an urban area to film our title sequence because it showed the 'dark' side of the great city of London, which is what we wanted to portray in my character.

No comments:

Post a Comment